RISK ASSESSMENT OF INVESTMENTS IN THE ART-INDUSTRY MARKET: SYSTEMATIZATION OF THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES
AbstractThe subject matter of the article is theset of theoretical, methodological and practical aspects in assessing investment risks in the art industry market. The goal of the research is the systematization of theoretical and methodological approaches to the assessment of investment risks in the art industry market and the practical recommendations development for the investment attractiveness of art investment objects assessing in order to determine the optimal investment strategy in the art industry market. The following tasks were solved in the article: four basic strategies of investing in the art industry are allocated; the systematization of the art-indexes reflecting the dynamics of the profitability of the art market is done, the estimation of price trends on the selected art-indexes of the profitability of the art market is analyzed, and the two types of profit, generating ownership of objects of art: financial and irrational (emotional) are defined; the methods of expert evaluation of art objects are considered, practical recommendations on investment attractiveness of art investment objects are developed. The following methods are used: abstract-logical analysis, theoretical generalization, system and statistical analysis. The following results were obtained:theprice and non-priced art-indexes that reflect the dynamics of the art market and allow assessing the risks of investment strategies in the art industry are systematized; the dynamics of trend of art-indexes is analyzed; the expediency of formation of informational and analytical support for estimating the investment attractiveness of art objects is substantiated. Conclusions: the expert assessment of the art object is an important part of the process of pricing and minimizing the risk of investing in the art industry market is proved.The theoretical positions and methodical approaches to the estimation of the art-indexes reflecting the dynamics of the profitability of the art market are generalized. It is proved that application of art-indexes allows to optimize investment analysis, to carry out a correct assessment of art objects, to make a perspective assessment of price trends. According to the results of the analysis of the art-indexes trends, it was found out that the correlation of the art market with the financial and commodity markets is weak. The art market is characterized by such specific features as: the low transparency and market liquidity; the problems of authenticity assessment; the complexity of analytical estimation of investment perspectives; it is possible to receive profits only in the long run, at least after 8-10 years. It is noted that ownership of objects of art generates two types of profit: financial and irrational (emotional). The application of the system of informational and analytical support for assessing the investment attractiveness of art objects is proposed, which will help to determine the optimal investment strategy in the market of art industry on the criterion of minimizing investment risks.
Momot, T. V., Momot, D. T. (2018), "Art-industry market infrastructure: the analysis of modern structure and functions" ["Infrastruktura rynku art-industrii: analiz suchasnoi struktury ta funktsii"], Innovative Technologies and Scientific Solutions for Industries, No. 2 (4), P. 34–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30837/2522-9818.2018.4.034.
Moulin, R. (1987), The French Art Market. A Sociological View. New Brunswick : Rutgers University Press, 227 p.
Janssen, S. (2001), "The empirical study of careers in literature and arts", in D. Schram and G. Steen (eds), The Psychology and Sociology of Literature, Amsterdam : Benjamins. P. 323–357.
Yogev, T. (2010), "The social construction of quality: Status dynamics in the market for contemporary art", Socio-Economic Review 8, No. 3, P. 511–536.
Akerlof, G. A. (1970), "The market for 'lemons': quality uncertainty and the market mechanisms", Quarterly Journal of Economics, No. 84, P. 488–500.
Rossel, J. (2007), "A sthetisierung, Unsicherheit und die Entwicklung von Markten", in J. Beckert, R. Diaz-Bone and H. Ganßmann (eds), Markte als soziale Strukturen, Frankfurt A. M. : Campus, P. 167–181.
Karpik, L. (2010), Valuing the Unique. The Economics of Singularities, Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, 288 p.
Baumol, W. J. (1986), "Unnatural Value: or Art Investment as Floating Crap Game", The American Economic Review, Vol. 76, No. 2, P. 10–14.
Frey, B. S., Pommerehne, W. W. (1989), Muses and Markets: Explorations in the Economics of the Arts. Blackwell, Oxford, 219 p.
Frey, Bruno S., Cueni, Reto (2013), "Why invest in art?", The economists’ voice, No. 10 (1), P. 1–6.
Goetzmann, William N. (1993), "Accounting for Taste: Art and Financial Markets over Three Centuries", American Economic Review, No. 83 (5), P. 1370–1376.
Goetzmann, W. N. et. al. (2011), "Art and Money", American Economic Review, No. 101 (3), P. 222–226.
Goetzmann, W. N., Spiegel, M. (1995), "Private Value Components, and the Winner’s Curse in an Art Index", European Economic Review, Vol. 39, P. 549–555.
Mei, J., Moses, M. (2002), "Art as an Investment and the Underperformance of Masterpieces", The American Economic Review, Vol. 92, No. 5, P. 1656–1668.
Mei, J., Moses, M. (2005), "Beautiful Asset: Art as Investment", Journal of Investment Consulting, Vol. 7, No. 2, P. 45–51.
Campbell, R. (2004), "The Art of Portfolio Diversification", Maastricht University – Limburg Institute of Financial Economics, Research Paper, No. WP05-001.
Campbell, R. (2008), "Art as a Financial Investment", The Journal of Alternative Investments. Spring, Vol. 10, No. 4, P. 64–81.
Kraeussl, R., Lee, J. (2010), "Art as an Investment: the Top 500 Artists", Department of Finance, VU University, Amsterdam, available at : http://www.efmaefm.org/0EFMSYMPOSIUM/2011-Toronto/papers/Kraeussl.pdf (last accessed 01.11.2018).
Buelens, N., Ginsburgh, V. (1993), "Revisiting Baumol's art as floating crap game", European Economic Review, Elsevier, Vol. 37 (7), P. 1351–1371.
Jakutis, R. (2013), "Apie kolekcijas", available at : http://www.snaujienos.lt/naujienos/mes-tokie/30866-apie-kolekcijas (last accessed 01.11.2018).
Renneboog, L., Spaenjers, C. (2011), "The Inconic Boom in Modern Russian Art", Journal of Alternative Investments, No. 13 (1), P. 67–80.
Higgs, H., Worthington, A. C. (2005), "Financial Returns and Price Determinants in the Australian Art Market, 1973-2003", The Economic Record, No. 81 (253), P. 113–123.
Agnello, R. J., Pierce, R. K. (1996), "Financial Returns, Price Determinants, and Genre Effects in American Art Investment", Journal of Cultural Economics, No. 20 (4), P. 359–383.
Artnet Analytics. "Artnet Indices White Paper", available at : http://www.artnet.com/analytics/reports/white-paper (last accessed 01.11.2018).
Pokhodiashcha, O. B. (2014), "On the issue of attribution of historical portraits XVII – beg. XIX century in museums of Ukraine" ["Do pytannia atrybutsii istorychnykh portretiv XVII – poch. XIX st. v muzeiakh Ukrainy"]. Pershi naukovi chytannia, prysviacheni pamiati profesora Oleksandra Ivanovycha Minzhulina : zbirnyk materialiv mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii, Kyiv : NAKKKiM, 2014. P. 100–104.
Abstract views: 29 PDF Downloads: 5
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors hold the copyright without restrictions and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-commercial and non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their published work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.