KEY COMPETENCE AS A BASIS FOR INNOVATION PROJECTS MANAGEMENT

Keywords: innovative project, management hierarchy, performance indicators, measurable effects, linear optimization, direct task, dual task, related tasks, objective function, system of restrictions

Abstract

By the implementing an enterprise development program, the existing key competence of the organization may undergo significant changes.  Also introducing innovations, you can get not only benefits, but additional problems and even risks.  It should be noted that an organization may have more than one key competence, especially when we deal with changes in the management structure or entering new markets.  For this class of tasks, the classical linear optimization problem does not fit, since it does not take into account the additional conditions that arise when an organization transitions from one state to another, precisely due to the implementation of the development program.  Therefore, to solve this problem, we need a dual problem. The subject of research in this article is the process of introducing key competence, as the main component of the management of innovative projects in the organization.  Objective: to develop a tool for introducing key competence into an organization’s work by solving a dual linear optimization problem. Tasks: to analyze the factors influencing the results and the possibility of introducing key competence in the organization’s activities, to obtain a general algorithm for the transition from direct to dual competence. Research methods: logical generalization, analysis and synthesis, structural analysis. Results: The article considers the key competence of the enterprise as the main component of the management of innovative projects, which the company implements.  Shown her place and the role that she plays.  A project description model has been developed, which describes processes that take into account the impact of the production and economic system on project implementation. The article proposes a general algorithm for constructing pairs of dual linear optimization problems.  The existing schemes of transition from a direct problem to a dual one are meaningful.  Considering this fact, a generalized algorithm for generating pairs of related problems has been proposed and strictly proved. Formalization of the developed scheme makes it easy to get the correct pairs of dual problems.  It is shown that the analysis of the key competence of the enterprise makes it possible to offer a new base for the formation of a strategic plan, the implementation of which will lead to the emergence (support) of a sustainable competitive advantage, as well as assess its potential in terms of financial plan and capabilities of the enterprise or business system as a whole. Conclusions: The tools for analysis and implementation of key competence in the organization’s activities have been developed. The results obtained in during the study allow us to state that a new base has been proposed for the formation of a strategic plan for the development of an enterprise, the use of this base will lead to a sustainable competitive advantage, which will become possible when implementing key competences in the process of changing the management structure.  Taking into account that an organization can have more than one key competence, the second competence is dual to the original, that allows a general transition from direct to dual competence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Lyudmyla Chernova, Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding
PhD (Engineering Sciences), Lecturer at the Department of Information Control Systems and Technologies

References

Druzhinin, Ye. A. (2006), Methodological bases of risk-oriented approach to resource management of engineering projects and programs [Metodolohichni osnovy ryzyk-oriyentovanoho pidkhodu do upravlinnya resursamy proektiv i prohram rozvytku tekhniky] : diss. ... doctor of techn. Sciences: 05.13.22 / Druzhinin Yevgeny Anatoliyovych, Kharkov, 593 p.

Voropaev, V. I. (2014), "Functional models of project management for different stakeholders" ["Funktsional'nyye modeli upravleniya proyektnoy deyatel'nost'yu dlya raznykh zainteresovannykh storon"], Project and Program Management, No. 4.

Bushuev, S. D., Bushueva, N. S. et al. (2010), Creative technologies of project and program management [Kreativnyye tekhnologii upravleniya proyektami i programmami] : Monograph, Kyiv : Sammit-knega, 768 p.

Belokon, A. I., Malanchi, S. A., Antonenko, S. V., Kotsyuba, T. V., Alkubalight, T.A.D. (2018), "Analysis of the significance of the project stakeholders", Bulletin of the Pridneprovsk State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture, No. 2, P. 81–94.

Rach, V. A. (2009), "Problems of information security in project management in the era of knowledge economy" ["Problemy zakhystu informatsiyi v upravlinni proektamy v epokhu ekonomiky znanʹ"], Project management and production development, No. 2, P. 156–160.

Tyan, R. B., Ivanov, S. V. (2009), Investment projects in the framework of strategic enterprise management [Investitsionnyye proyekty v ramkakh strategicheskogo upravleniya predpriyatiyem]: Monograph. D. : Makovetsky, 404 p.

Mazur, I. I., Shapiro, V. D., Olderogge, N. G., Polkovnikov, A. V. (2014), Project management [Upravleniye proyektami], Moscow : Omega-L, 959 p.

Bushuev, S. D., Bushueva, N. S. (2006), Project Management: The Basics of Professional Knowledge and the Competence Assessment System of Project Managers (National Competence Baseline, NCB UA Version 3.0) [Upravleniye proyektami: Osnovy professional'nykh znaniy i sistema otsenki kompetentnosti proyektnykh menedzherov (National Competence Baseline, NCB UA Version 3.0)], Kyiv : ІRIDIUM, 208 p.

Bushueva, N. S. (2007), Models and methods of proactive management of organizational development programs [Modeli i metody proaktivnogo upravleniya programmami organizatsionnogo razvitiya]: Monograph, Kyiv : Science. Svit, 199 p.

Hiroshi Tanaka (2006), "Integrated management of multiprojects in contracting organizations"["Kompleksnoye upravleniye mul'tiproyektami v podryadnykh organizatsiyakh"], Project and Program Management, No. 2.

Shigenobu Ohara (2005), "Application of the P2M methodology in civil engineering and analysis of the results" ["Primeneniye metodologii R2M v grazhdanskom stroitel'stve i analiz rezul'tatov"], Project and Program Management, No. 3.

Grashina, M., Duncan, V. (2006), Fundamentals of Project Management [Osnovy upravleniya proyektami], SPb : Peter, 208 p.

Parkhomenko, O. M., Osievsky, A. (2000), Machine-Building Enterprise Management: Functions, Organizational Structure, Personnel [Upravleniye mashinostroitel'nym predpriyatiyem: funktsii, organizatsionnaya struktura, kadry] : Uch. Allowance, Kharkiv : Nat. aerospace. un-t "KhAI", 160 p.

Guide to the management of innovative projects and programs: T. 1, version 1.2 [Rukovodstvo po upravleniyu innovatsionnymi proyektami i programmami : T. 1, versiya 1.2] / [trans. in Russian language ed. S. D. Bushueva]. – Kyiv : Sciences. Svit, 2009, 173 p.

Novikov, D. A. (2007), Project Management: Organizational Mechanisms [Upravlinnya proektamy: orhanizatsiyni mekhanizmy], Moscow : PMOFT, 140 p.

Zelenkov, Yu. A. (2012), "Strategic IT development planning. Model of strategic decision making under uncertainty" ["Strategicheskoye planirovaniye razvitiya IT. Model' prinyatiya strategicheskikh resheniy v usloviyakh neopredelennosti"], Information Management, No. 4, P. 26–38.

Hamel, G., Prahalad, K. (2002), Competition for the Future. The creation of the market of tomorrow [Konkurentsii za budushcheye. Sozdaniye rynka zavtrashnego dnya], Moscow : ZAO “Olympip-Business”, 288 p.

Hamel, G., Prahalad, K. (2005), Strategic flexibility [Strategicheskaya gibkost'], SPB : Peter, 384 p.

Prangishvili, I. V. (2000), System approach and system-wide regularities. Series "Systems of Management Problems" [Systemnyy pidkhid ta zahalʹnosystemni zakonomirnosti. Seriya «Systemy problem upravlinnya»], Moscow : SINTEG, 528 p.

Nazarova, G., & Nazarov, N. (2017), "The analysis of structural configurations for implementing competitive strategies", Innovative Technologies and Scientific Solutions for Industries, No. 2 (2), P. 132–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30837/2522-9818.2017.2.132.

Kuznetsova, I. (2017), "Formalizing the technology of management as а constituent of the organization core capabilities", Innovative Technologies and Scientific Solutions for Industries, No. 2 (2), P. 116–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30837/2522-9818.2017.2.116.

Hetmantsev, V. D. (2001), Linear algebra and linear programming [Liniyna alhebra i liniyne prohramuvannya], Kyiv, Lybid, 250 p.

Romanyuk, T. P., Tereshchenko, T. O., Prisenko, G. V., Gorodokova, I. М. (1996), Mathematical programming [Matematychne prohramuvannya], Kyiv, Libel, 312 p.


Abstract views: 24
PDF Downloads: 16
Published
2019-03-22
How to Cite
Chernova, L. (2019) “KEY COMPETENCE AS A BASIS FOR INNOVATION PROJECTS MANAGEMENT”, INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES AND SCIENTIFIC SOLUTIONS FOR INDUSTRIES, (1 (7), pp. 113-120. doi: 10.30837/2522-9818.2019.7.113.